Re: Full Disclosure works, here's proof:

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Bela Lubkin: "Re: pt_chmod"
• Previous message: Bob Manson: "Re: [8lgm]-Advisory-14.UNIX.SCO-prwarn.12-Nov-1994"
• Maybe in reply to: Christopher Klaus: "Full Disclosure works, here's proof:"
• Next in thread: Karl Strickland: "Re: Full Disclosure works, here's proof:"

Christopher Klaus wrote:

> I think I would take the time to install a patch that has been fully
> disclosed and know that most no-brain wannabe hackers are going to be
> trying it on my system, versus a patch that fixes a problem that only SCO
> and CERT know about and I will probably never have a problem with. 

This is ridiculous.  You'd decline to install a security patch because
you think not enough hackers know about the hole?

>Bela<

• Next message: Bela Lubkin: "Re: pt_chmod"
• Previous message: Bob Manson: "Re: [8lgm]-Advisory-14.UNIX.SCO-prwarn.12-Nov-1994"
• Maybe in reply to: Christopher Klaus: "Full Disclosure works, here's proof:"
• Next in thread: Karl Strickland: "Re: Full Disclosure works, here's proof:"